题目回顾
Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
这道题属于典型的“讨论双方观点+个人立场”类型，要求考生平衡分析两种态度，并给出明确结论。
高分范文结构解析
引言段：明确议题与立场
开篇需直接回应题目,避免冗余背景描述，高分范例如下：
"People hold divergent views on whether to endure adverse circumstances or actively seek change. While acceptance may foster resilience, I contend that proactive efforts often yield more meaningful outcomes."
得分点：
- 用"divergent views"替换"different opinions"，体现词汇多样性；
- 明确双方观点,并直接亮出个人立场（I contend...）；
- 避免模板句,如"With the development of society..."。
主体段1：支持“接受现状”的论据
讨论第一种观点时,需合理使用让步逻辑，体现辩证思考：
"Advocates of acceptance argue that enduring hardships cultivates mental resilience. For instance, employees tolerating repetitive tasks may develop patience, a trait valuable in both professional and personal realms. Additionally, constant dissatisfaction might lead to stress, whereas contentment fosters psychological well-being."
得分点：
- 用"cultivates mental resilience"等学术短语替代简单表达；
- 举例具体（repetitive tasks），避免空泛；
- 通过对比（dissatisfaction vs. contentment）强化论证。
主体段2：支持“改变现状”的论据
转折后需用更强论据支持反驳,注意逻辑衔接：
"However, passive acceptance can perpetuate stagnation. History shows that progress stems from challenging the status quo—consider how innovators like Steve Jobs rejected mediocrity, revolutionising technology. Similarly, individuals improving financial literacy often escape poverty cycles, proving that targeted efforts can alter trajectories."
得分点：
- 用"perpetuate stagnation"等精准词汇；
- 引用历史案例（Steve Jobs）增强说服力；
- 从个人与社会层面多角度论证。
个人观点段：提出折中方案
高分作文常采用平衡立场,展现批判性思维：
"While acceptance has merits, its value depends on context. In cases like terminal illness, resilience is vital; yet for solvable issues like career dissatisfaction, proactive planning—such as upskilling or networking—is more constructive. Thus, discernment between mutable and immutable circumstances is key."
得分点：
- 通过具体情境（terminal illness vs. career）区分适用性；
- 提出行动建议（upskilling），增强实用性；
- 用"discernment"等词体现思维深度。
语言提分技巧
-
词汇升级
- 普通表达：try to improve → 高分替换：strive to ameliorate
- 普通表达：bad situation → 高分替换：adverse circumstances
-
句式多样性
- 条件句："Were individuals to passively accept all hardships, societal progress would stagnate."
- 倒装句："Not only does acceptance reduce stress, but it also builds endurance."
-
衔接自然
- 避免Firstly/Secondly，改用："A further justification lies in..."
- 对比衔接："Conversely, those advocating change posit that..."
常见误区警示
-
逻辑跳跃
错误示范："People should accept bad jobs because money is important."（未解释关联性）
修正思路：明确因果链—"Accepting low-paid jobs may provide short-term stability, yet long-term financial security often requires career advancement." -
例证不当
避免虚构数据（如"80% of people..."），改用公认事实："UN data indicates that 60% of workers feel disengaged due to unchallenging roles." -
立场模糊
错误示范："Both views are good."
高分写法："While acceptance suits uncontrollable factors, self-initiated change remains preferable for manageable issues."
雅思写作的高分本质在于清晰逻辑、精准语言与辩证思维的融合，考生应多分析剑桥范文的论证脉络，而非机械背诵模板，针对此题，核心在于区分“可控与不可控因素”，并据此选择应对策略——这一思路同样适用于人生决策。
