教育类话题 Some people believe that university education should be available to all students, while others think it should be limited to good students. Discuss both views and give your opinion.**
范文：
The accessibility of higher education has long been a contentious issue. While some argue universities should admit only high-achieving students, others advocate for open access regardless of academic performance. Both perspectives have valid reasoning, yet a balanced approach may be more beneficial.
Proponents of selective admission emphasize the importance of maintaining academic standards. Universities, as centers of advanced learning, require students capable of rigorous intellectual engagement. Restricting enrollment ensures resources are allocated efficiently, fostering an environment where talented individuals can thrive. For instance, elite institutions like Oxford or Harvard prioritize meritocracy, which enhances their global reputation.
Conversely, proponents of universal access highlight education as a fundamental right. Limiting opportunities based on past performance may overlook late bloomers or those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Countries like Germany offer free university education, enabling social mobility and reducing inequality. Moreover, diverse student bodies enrich classroom discussions, promoting creativity and critical thinking.
In my view, while academic excellence should be rewarded, equal opportunity is equally vital. Governments could implement policies such as conditional admission or foundation programs to support less-prepared students. This approach balances merit with inclusivity, ultimately strengthening both individuals and society.
得分要点：
- 清晰呈现双方观点,逻辑连贯。
- 使用具体案例（牛津、哈佛、德国）增强说服力。
- 提出折中方案,体现批判性思维。
科技类话题 Artificial intelligence will replace many human jobs in the future. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?**
范文：
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked debates about its impact on employment. While AI-driven automation threatens traditional jobs, it also creates new opportunities. This essay will analyze both sides before concluding that the benefits ultimately prevail.
On the negative side, job displacement is a legitimate concern. Roles in manufacturing, customer service, and even professions like accounting face automation. For example, self-checkout systems in supermarkets reduce the need for cashiers, potentially increasing unemployment among low-skilled workers. Such trends could exacerbate income inequality if retraining programs are inadequate.
However, AI also generates significant advantages. By handling repetitive tasks, it allows humans to focus on creative and strategic work. In healthcare, AI assists in diagnosing diseases with higher accuracy, improving patient outcomes. Additionally, new industries emerge, such as AI ethics consulting or machine learning engineering, offering fresh career paths. Historical precedents, like the Industrial Revolution, show that technological shifts eventually lead to net job creation.
Ultimately, the key lies in adaptation. Governments and educational institutions must prioritize reskilling initiatives to prepare the workforce. With proper policies, AI can enhance productivity and quality of life without causing widespread job loss.
得分要点：
- 利弊分析全面,结合具体行业案例。
- 引入历史对比（工业革命），展示深度思考。
- 提出解决方案,体现建设性立场。
社会类话题 Some people think that governments should spend money on public services rather than on arts like music and painting. To what extent do you agree?**
范文：
The allocation of government funds often sparks debate, particularly when comparing essential services to cultural projects. While public services like healthcare and infrastructure are undeniably vital, arts funding should not be neglected. A balanced budget that supports both domains is crucial for societal well-being.
Critics of arts funding argue that limited resources must address immediate needs. Hospitals, schools, and public transportation directly impact citizens’ daily lives, whereas music or painting may seem like luxuries. In developing nations, prioritizing basic amenities is understandable, as malnutrition or poor sanitation demand urgent attention.
Yet, the arts play an equally important role. Culturally rich societies foster creativity, tourism, and national identity. For instance, the Louvre in France attracts millions of visitors annually, boosting the economy. Moreover, arts education enhances cognitive skills in children, improving academic performance across subjects. Cutting such funding risks creating a utilitarian society devoid of inspiration.
Rather than an either-or choice, governments should seek synergies. Public-private partnerships could fund arts projects, while taxes on entertainment industries might generate revenue. This ensures citizens enjoy both functional services and cultural enrichment.
得分要点：
- 承认对立观点的合理性,避免绝对化表述。
- 强调艺术的经济和教育价值,用卢浮宫为例。
- 提出兼顾方案,展现辩证思维。
如何高效利用范文备考
- 拆解结构：学习范文的引言、主体段、结论的布局，模仿其逻辑推进方式。
- 积累词汇：摘录高分短语（如"meritocracy"、"exacerbate inequality"）并灵活运用。
- 模拟练习：针对同类题目限时写作，对比范文优化表达。
雅思写作的高分秘诀在于清晰的观点、有力的论证和地道的语言，通过反复研读和模仿优质范文，考生可以逐步摆脱模板化表达，形成个人风格，坚持分析考官范文和考生高分案例，结合反馈调整，写作能力必将显著提升。
