雅思写作任务2中的讨论双方题型（Discuss Both Views）要求考生客观分析两种对立观点，并给出个人立场，这类题目考察逻辑思维、语言表达和论证能力，本文将提供一套高分的作文模板，结合官方评分标准，帮助考生快速构建清晰框架。
题型特点与评分标准
讨论双方题型通常以以下形式出现：
"Some people believe... Others argue... Discuss both views and give your own opinion."
考官重点评估四个维度：
- 任务回应（Task Response）：是否全面讨论双方观点并明确表态
- 连贯与衔接（Coherence & Cohesion）：段落逻辑是否清晰，连接词是否恰当
- 词汇丰富度（Lexical Resource）：用词准确性与多样性
- 语法多样性（Grammatical Range & Accuracy）：句式结构是否灵活
四段式高分模板
开头段（Introduction）
- 背景句：概括题目背景（避免照抄题干）
- 观点转述：用同义改写呈现双方立场
- Thesis Statement：明确说明将讨论双方并给出个人观点
范例：
The debate over whether governments should fund arts or prioritize public services has persisted for decades. While advocates argue that arts funding preserves cultural heritage, opponents contend that tax money must address urgent social needs. This essay will examine both perspectives before asserting that balanced allocation is optimal.
主体段1（View 1讨论）
- Topic Sentence：明确陈述第一种观点
- Explanation：解释观点背后的逻辑
- Example：用具体案例或数据支持
- Linking Phrase：过渡到下一观点
范例：
Proponents of arts funding emphasize its role in national identity. Theatres, museums, and folk traditions act as collective memory, fostering social cohesion. For instance, UNESCO's Creative Cities Network shows how cultural investments boost tourism and local pride. However, critics question this priority when...
主体段2（View 2讨论）
- Topic Sentence：陈述对立观点
- Comparison：与View 1形成对比
- Evidence：引用研究或权威报告
- Concession：适当承认合理性
范例：
Conversely, public service advocates highlight tangible welfare impacts. A World Health Organization report reveals that every $1 invested in healthcare yields $4 in economic productivity. Whereas arts funding benefits specific groups, hospitals and schools serve entire populations. This pragmatic view, though compelling, overlooks...
结尾段（Conclusion）
- 立场重申：用不同句式强调个人观点
- 平衡陈述：指出双方合理性与局限性
- 升华建议：提出折中方案或未来展望
范例：
While public services demand urgent funding, completely neglecting arts would impoverish societal values. A viable solution lies in tiered budgeting: allocating 70% to essential services and 30% to cultural projects. Such an approach respects both economic and humanistic priorities.
加分技巧
-
辩证表达：
- While X claims..., Y counters by...
- This argument, albeit valid, fails to consider...
-
数据引用：
- 使用虚拟数据：Studies suggest approximately 60% of citizens...
- 引用国际组织：According to OECD statistics...
-
避免绝对化：
- 替换always/never为tend to/rarely
- 用It is widely believed替代Everyone knows
-
衔接词升级：
- 基础：Firstly, Secondly → 高级：Primarily, Subsequently
- 对比：Instead → Conversely
常见错误警示
- 立场模糊：结尾段才首次出现个人观点
- 论证失衡：某一方论述篇幅超过60%
- 案例空洞：仅说for example而无具体内容
- 时态混乱：在举例时误用现在完成时
真题演练（2023年题型）
Some think children should start school at 4, others argue for 7. Discuss both views.
速构提纲：
- 早入学：认知开发优势（引用皮亚杰理论）
- 晚入学：情感发展更健康（北欧教育模式案例）
- 个人立场：弹性入学年龄+个性化评估
写作时注意：教育类词汇需精准（cognitive development替代intelligence growth），避免重复advantage/disadvantage，可用merit/drawback轮换。
雅思写作的本质是展示思辨能力，不是背诵模板，建议考生在掌握结构后，针对科技、环境、社会等高频话题各练习3篇，逐步形成个人风格，考官更看重论证深度而非观点标新立异,用扎实的逻辑和地道的表达才能赢得高分。
