雅思写作是许多考生最头疼的部分，既要逻辑清晰，又要语言精准，为了帮助大家高效备考，我们整理了一篇满分范文，并详细解析其得分点，无论你是初次备考还是希望冲刺高分，这篇范文都能提供有价值的参考。
回顾
Some people believe that university education should be available to all students. Others think that only the most talented students should have access to higher education. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
满分范文
Higher education has long been regarded as a gateway to better career prospects and personal development. However, opinions differ on whether universities should admit all students or restrict access to the most academically gifted. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting a balanced conclusion.
On one hand, proponents of universal university education argue that higher learning should be accessible to everyone, regardless of academic ability. They believe that education is a fundamental right, and limiting access based on talent could perpetuate social inequality. Many individuals may not excel in traditional exams but possess practical skills or creative talents that universities can nurture. For example, some successful entrepreneurs did not perform well in school yet thrived in business due to innovative thinking. Additionally, a more inclusive education system fosters diversity, allowing students from different backgrounds to exchange ideas and broaden their perspectives.
On the other hand, supporters of selective admission policies contend that universities should prioritize students with exceptional academic potential. Higher education requires significant resources, and admitting only the brightest ensures these are used efficiently. If universities lower entry standards, the quality of education may decline, ultimately devaluing degrees. Moreover, certain fields, such as medicine or engineering, demand high levels of expertise, and only the most capable students can meet these rigorous demands. Countries like Germany and Singapore employ selective systems, ensuring their graduates remain highly competitive in the global job market.
While both arguments have merit, I believe a balanced approach is ideal. Universities should maintain high standards but also provide alternative pathways for students with diverse strengths. Vocational training and online courses can complement traditional degrees, ensuring everyone has opportunities to succeed. Governments and institutions must invest in scholarships and support systems to help disadvantaged students compete fairly.
得分点解析
-
清晰的结构
文章采用经典的四段式：引言、两个主体段、每个段落逻辑连贯，观点明确，符合雅思写作评分标准中的“Coherence and Cohesion”要求。 -
辩证分析
作者没有偏袒某一方，而是客观讨论两种观点，并在结尾提出个人见解，这种平衡的论述方式展现了批判性思维，符合“Task Achievement”的高分标准。 -
精准的词汇与语法
文中使用多样化的句式，如复合句（“While both arguments have merit…”）、条件句（“If universities lower entry standards…”），并避免重复用词，词汇选择恰当，如“perpetuate”“rigorous”“complement”等，体现语言丰富性。
-
具体例证
通过德国和新加坡的教育体系、成功企业家的案例，增强了论证的说服力，考官青睐具体实例而非空泛的陈述。 -
自然的衔接
过渡词（“On one hand”“Moreover”“Additionally”）使行文流畅，避免生硬转折。
备考建议
-
多读高分范文
分析优秀文章的结构和表达方式，模仿其论证逻辑。 -
限时练习
雅思写作时间紧张，平时训练需控制在40分钟内完成。
-
积累话题词汇
按教育、科技、环境等常见主题分类记忆词汇，避免考场词穷。 -
重视反馈
找专业教师或高分考生批改，发现语法错误和逻辑漏洞。
雅思写作没有捷径，但掌握正确方法可以事半功倍，这篇范文展示了如何构建有说服力的论证，希望考生能从中获得启发,在考场上写出同样优秀的文章。
