雅思写作考试中，大作文（Task 2）占据重要分数比例，要求考生在40分钟内完成一篇至少250词的议论文，许多考生在备考时往往缺乏清晰的写作框架和高质量的范文参考，导致难以突破6分瓶颈，本文提供一篇高分范文，并解析其结构、词汇和逻辑，帮助考生掌握写作技巧。
分析
*
Some people believe that the government should fund and control scientific research, while others argue that private companies should take the lead. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.*
- government funding & control
- private sector leadership
- scientific research
题型： 双边讨论（Discuss both views）
范文
Introduction（引言）
Scientific research drives technological advancement and societal progress, yet debates persist over whether governments or private enterprises should dominate its funding and direction. While state involvement ensures long-term public benefits, corporate research often yields faster innovation. This essay examines both perspectives before concluding that a balanced approach is optimal.
Body Paragraph 1（政府资助的优势）
Government-funded research prioritizes public welfare over profit, addressing issues like climate change or infectious diseases that may lack immediate commercial appeal. For instance, NASA’s space exploration, though costly, has spurred breakthroughs in satellite technology and medical imaging. Additionally, state oversight prevents ethical violations, such as unchecked genetic experimentation. Taxpayer-funded projects also ensure transparency, as seen in the open-access policies of many national research institutes.
Body Paragraph 2（私营企业主导的合理性）
Conversely, private companies excel in efficiency and market-driven innovation. Pharmaceutical firms, motivated by competition, develop life-saving drugs at unprecedented speeds, as demonstrated by the rapid creation of COVID-19 vaccines. Tech giants like Google and Tesla invest heavily in AI and renewable energy, translating discoveries into consumer products faster than bureaucratic systems allow. Profit incentives also attract top talent, fostering a dynamic research ecosystem.
Body Paragraph 3（个人观点）
A hybrid model maximizes strengths while mitigating weaknesses. Governments should fund foundational research—quantum computing or clean energy—while corporations commercialize applications. Collaborative initiatives, such as public-private partnerships in cancer research, demonstrate this synergy. Over-reliance on either sector risks stagnation or ethical compromises; balance ensures sustainable progress.
Conclusion（
The dichotomy between government and private research is false. Strategic collaboration, not dominance, will yield the most equitable and innovative outcomes for society.
写作技巧解析
-
清晰的结构
- 引言明确立场，避免模棱两可。
- 每个主体段聚焦一个观点，用“For instance”“as demonstrated by”等短语衔接例子。
- 结论重申核心论点，避免简单重复。
-
学术词汇与句式
- 使用正式词汇（e.g., “mitigate,” “dichotomy”）和复杂句型（e.g., “While…, corporate research…”）。
- 避免口语化表达，如“a lot of”改为“a significant number of”。
-
论证逻辑
- 每个论点后紧跟具体案例（NASA、COVID-19疫苗等），增强说服力。
- 对比句式（e.g., “Conversely…”）强化双边讨论的平衡性。
常见错误规避
- 跑题：紧扣“funding and control”而非泛泛讨论科学价值。
- 论证单薄：避免未展开的断言，如“Private companies are better”需解释“why”和“how”。
- 语法错误：注意主谓一致（e.g., “Pharmaceutical firms… develop”）和冠词用法（e.g., “the government” vs. “a government”）。
高分句型储备
- 引言模板：
“While X ensures…, Y often… This essay examines… before concluding that…” - 对比论证：
“Proponents of X argue…; however, Y advocates counter that…” - 结论升华：
“The solution lies not in… but in…”
练习建议
- 仿写范文结构，替换不同话题（教育、环境等）。
- 限时写作后，对照评分标准（TR/CC/LR/GRA）自我批改。
- 积累领域特定词汇（e.g., “peer-reviewed journals” for academia）。
科学研究的未来取决于资源与智慧的整合，政府与私营部门各司其职，才能让创新既服务于公共利益,又保持蓬勃活力。
