雅思写作Task 2中的Discussion类题目要求考生探讨某一议题的不同观点，并给出自己的立场，这类题目通常以“Discuss both views and give your opinion”或“To what extent do you agree or disagree”等形式出现，掌握Discussion结构的写作方法，能够帮助考生在逻辑性和连贯性上获得高分。
Discussion类题目核心要求
Discussion类作文的核心在于平衡讨论,既要客观分析双方观点，又要清晰表达个人立场，考官会重点评估以下几点：
- 观点覆盖全面性——是否充分讨论题目中的不同立场；
- 论证逻辑性——论据是否合理支持观点；
- 语言表达的准确性——词汇和语法是否符合学术写作标准；
- 文章结构的清晰度——段落是否层次分明，衔接自然。
标准Discussion结构解析
一篇高分的Discussion类作文通常采用四段式或五段式结构,以下是最常见的框架：
引言段（Introduction）
- 背景句：简要引入话题，避免直接抄写题目； 重述**：用自己的话概括题目中的争议点；
- 个人立场（可选）：如果题目明确要求给出观点，可在引言段结尾表明态度。
例句：
In recent years, the debate over whether governments should fund arts or sciences has intensified. While some argue that scientific research deserves more investment due to its tangible benefits, others believe cultural development is equally vital. This essay will examine both perspectives before concluding that a balanced approach is optimal.
主体段1（支持一方观点）
- 主题句：明确阐述第一个观点；
- 论据1：用具体例子或数据支持；
- 论据2：进一步展开分析；
- 衔接句：过渡到下一段。
例句：
Proponents of prioritizing science funding often highlight its direct impact on societal progress. For instance, medical breakthroughs like vaccines have drastically reduced mortality rates, demonstrating how scientific investment saves lives. Additionally, technological advancements driven by engineering research boost economic productivity, making it a pragmatic choice for budget allocation.
主体段2（支持另一方观点）
- 主题句：提出对立观点；
- 论据1：结合实例说明；
- 论据2：深化论证；
- 对比分析（可选）：与前一段观点形成对比。
例句：
Conversely, advocates for arts funding argue that cultural enrichment is indispensable for a nation’s identity. The Louvre in France, for example, not only preserves heritage but also attracts millions of tourists annually, contributing significantly to the economy. Moreover, creative industries such as film and music foster soft power, enhancing global influence in ways science cannot replicate.
结论段（Conclusion）
- 总结双方观点：用1-2句话概括讨论；
- 重申个人立场：明确回答题目要求；
- 建议或展望（可选）：提出解决方案或未来趋势。
例句：
While science undeniably drives practical innovation, the arts play a crucial role in shaping societal values. Therefore, policymakers should strive for equilibrium, allocating resources to both fields to ensure comprehensive national development.
高分技巧与常见错误
技巧1：使用恰当的连接词
- 对比：However, On the other hand, Conversely
- 补充：Furthermore, Moreover, In addition
- Thus, Hence, Consequently
技巧2：避免绝对化表达
- 错误：Science is always more important than arts.
- 修正：Science tends to yield more immediate benefits in certain contexts.
技巧3：平衡篇幅与深度
- 主体段长度尽量均匀,避免某一观点过于简略；
- 每个论据后添加分析,而非简单罗列例子。
常见错误：
- 偏题：只讨论一方观点，忽略题目中的“both views”要求；
- 立场模糊：结论段未明确回答是否同意某一观点；
- 论据空洞：使用泛泛而谈的陈述，如“Art is important because it is creative.”
实战案例与模板
Some people believe that children should learn practical skills at school, such as cooking or budgeting, while others think academic subjects like mathematics and science are more essential. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
引言段：
Education systems worldwide face ongoing debates about curriculum priorities. While traditionalists emphasize core subjects for intellectual development, modern educators advocate life skills training to prepare students for adulthood. This essay will evaluate both approaches before arguing for an integrated model.
主体段1（学术科目）：
Academic disciplines form the foundation of critical thinking. Mathematics, for instance, cultivates problem-solving abilities applicable to fields like engineering or finance. Similarly, scientific literacy enables informed decisions about health and technology, proving indispensable in an increasingly complex world.
主体段2（生活技能）：
However, practical competencies are equally vital. Many graduates struggle with basic tasks like tax filing or meal planning, revealing gaps in traditional education. Countries like Finland have addressed this by incorporating financial literacy into syllabuses, resulting in higher adolescent self-sufficiency rates.
结论段：
Balancing theoretical knowledge with hands-on skills is key. Schools should redesign curricula to include both calculus and cooking, equipping students for multifaceted challenges.
通过系统训练Discussion结构,考生能够有效提升Task 2的得分，核心在于清晰呈现对立观点，并用具体论据支撑分析，最后以连贯的逻辑收尾。
