在雅思写作考试中,观点类作文（Opinion Essay）是常见题型之一，要求考生清晰表达立场并展开论证，这类题目通常以“To what extent do you agree or disagree?”或“Discuss both views and give your opinion”等形式出现，想要在考试中取得高分，不仅需要逻辑清晰，还要具备扎实的语言功底和充分的论据支持，以下是一篇高分范文及详细解析，帮助考生掌握写作技巧。
题目：Some people believe that the government should fund arts programs, while others argue that this money should be spent on public services. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
范文：
The allocation of government funds is a contentious issue, particularly when it comes to supporting the arts versus essential public services. While some advocate for increased investment in cultural initiatives, others contend that healthcare, education, and infrastructure should take priority. This essay will examine both perspectives before concluding that a balanced approach is most beneficial.
On one hand, proponents of arts funding argue that cultural programs enrich society. Museums, theaters, and music festivals not only preserve heritage but also foster creativity and critical thinking. For instance, countries like France and Italy allocate significant budgets to the arts, reinforcing their global cultural influence. Additionally, the arts industry generates employment and stimulates tourism, contributing to economic growth. Without government support, many artistic endeavors might struggle to survive, leading to a loss of cultural diversity.
Conversely, critics of arts funding emphasize the urgency of improving public services. In many nations, hospitals face overcrowding, schools lack resources, and transportation systems are outdated. Taxpayers often expect their money to address these pressing issues rather than subsidize what some perceive as non-essential activities. For example, in developing countries, diverting funds from healthcare to the arts could be seen as irresponsible, especially when basic needs remain unmet.
However, dismissing the arts entirely would be shortsighted. A well-rounded society requires both material and intellectual nourishment. Instead of choosing one over the other, governments should adopt a pragmatic approach. By setting clear priorities—such as ensuring adequate healthcare and education first—they can still allocate a smaller portion of the budget to cultural projects. Public-private partnerships could also supplement funding, reducing the burden on taxpayers while sustaining the arts.
In my view, while public services are undeniably vital, the arts play an equally important role in shaping national identity and individual well-being. A government’s responsibility extends beyond mere functionality; it must also cultivate a vibrant, innovative society. Therefore, a measured allocation of resources, with transparency and public consultation, would strike the optimal balance.
高分技巧解析
-
明确立场，避免模棱两可
观点类作文需清晰表达立场，本文在首段提出“balanced approach”作为核心论点，并在结尾重申，避免骑墙态度。 -
逻辑递进，论证充分
每个段落围绕一个核心论点展开，如第二段讨论艺术的社会价值，第三段分析公共服务的必要性，第四段提出折中方案，结构严谨。
-
举例具体，增强说服力
提到法国、意大利的案例，以及发展中国家的情况，使论证更具可信度。 -
语言精准，避免冗余
使用“proponents”“contend”“pragmatic”等学术词汇，但避免过度复杂化，确保流畅性。 -
平衡讨论双方观点
即使支持某一立场，仍需客观分析对立观点，体现批判性思维。
常见错误与改进建议
-
问题：论证空洞
改进：用数据、实例或类比支撑论点，如“Arts funding contributes 2.5% to GDP in some European nations”（需根据实际数据调整）。
-
问题：立场模糊
改进：避免“It depends”类表述，明确选择“agree/disagree”或提出具体解决方案。 -
问题：语法错误
改进：减少长难句，主谓一致、时态需严格检查。“The government are”应改为“The government is”。
