雅思写作任务二常要求考生讨论某一问题的双方观点，并给出自己的见解，这类题目看似简单，但要写出高分作文，必须掌握清晰的论证结构、合理的逻辑衔接以及丰富的语言表达，本文将详细分析如何高效应对这类题目，帮助考生提升写作水平。
类型分析
讨论双方观点的题目通常以以下形式出现：
- Some people believe that…, while others argue that… Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
- There are differing opinions on… What are the advantages and disadvantages of each perspective?
要求考生客观分析两种对立观点，并最终给出个人立场，关键在于平衡论述，避免偏颇，同时确保逻辑严密。
文章结构安排
一篇高分讨论类雅思作文通常包含四部分：
引言（Introduction）
- 背景句：简要介绍话题背景，避免直接抄题。 用不同句式表达题目要求。
- 明确立场：可在此处或结尾表明个人观点。
示例：
The debate over whether university education should be free has persisted for decades. While some argue that it ensures equal opportunities, others contend that it places an unsustainable burden on governments. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting a reasoned conclusion.
主体段一（支持第一种观点）
- 主题句：清晰陈述第一种观点。
- 论证：提供1-2个具体理由，辅以例证或数据。
- 衔接：使用逻辑连接词（例如Furthermore, For instance）。
示例：
Proponents of free higher education assert that it promotes social mobility. In countries like Germany, where tuition fees are abolished, enrollment rates among low-income families have significantly increased. Additionally, an educated workforce drives economic growth, benefiting society as a whole.
主体段二（支持第二种观点）
- 主题句：明确第二种对立观点。
- 论证：同样提供1-2个理由，避免与上一段重复。
- 对比：可使用对比句式（However, On the contrary）。
示例：
Opponents, however, highlight the financial strain on national budgets. The UK’s experiment with tuition fees revealed that taxpayer-funded universities often face funding shortages, compromising educational quality. Moreover, free education may devalue degrees if enrollment surges without adequate resources.
Conclusion）
- 总结双方核心论点（1-2句）。
- 明确个人立场，并简要说明理由。
示例：
While free university education fosters equality, its economic feasibility remains questionable. In my view, a hybrid model—subsidized fees with needs-based scholarships—strikes the optimal balance.
高分技巧
平衡论述
避免在某一观点上过度展开，两段篇幅应大致相当，确保考官看到全面分析能力。
使用学术词汇
- 替代“think”：argue, contend, assert, advocate
- 替代“good”：beneficial, advantageous, merit-worthy
增强逻辑性
- 因果衔接：Consequently, As a result
- 对比衔接：By contrast, Conversely
举例具体化
避免泛泛而谈，提及国家、研究报告或历史事件（如“A 2020 OECD study showed…”）能增强说服力。
常见误区
- 立场模糊：未在结尾明确表达观点，或首尾立场矛盾。
- 论据重复：两段使用相似理由（如都讨论“经济影响”）。
- 语言口语化：滥用缩写（can’t）或短语（a lot of）。
实战演练
Should governments fund arts programs?”为例：
Public funding for the arts has long been contentious. While cultural advocates emphasize its societal value, fiscal conservatives deem it a misallocation of resources. This essay evaluates both arguments.
主体段1（支持资助）：
Art subsidies preserve cultural heritage. For example, France’s Louvre Museum relies on state funds to maintain priceless artworks accessible to all. Furthermore, creative industries contribute 3% of global GDP, justifying public investment.
主体段2（反对资助）：
Critics argue that taxpayer money should prioritize healthcare or infrastructure. During the 2008 recession, Greece slashed arts budgets to fund emergency services—a decision supported by 68% of citizens in polls.
Although arts funding enriches society, its priority during economic crises is debatable. I believe governments should adopt tiered funding, allocating more to essential services while maintaining baseline cultural support.
个人观点
讨论双方观点的文章并非简单堆砌论点，而是展示辩证思维的过程，通过精准的结构、多样的句式和扎实的例证，考生能有效提升文章的说服力与连贯性，雅思写作的本质是考察逻辑与语言的双重能力，因此平时需多积累话题词汇，并模拟限时训练,方能在考场上游刃有余。
