雅思写作Task 2一直是考生备考的重点，2018年11月29日的题目更是典型的社会类议题，本文将深入分析题目要求，提供清晰的写作思路，并分享高分范文与实用技巧，帮助考生在考场上游刃有余。
题目回顾
Some people believe that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, think that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
属于“双边讨论+个人观点”类型，要求考生分析两种对立观点，并给出自己的立场，关键在于平衡讨论，避免偏颇，同时提供有力的论据支持个人观点。
观点解析
支持增加体育设施的观点
- 促进全民运动
体育设施（如健身房、游泳池、公园）的普及能降低运动门槛，鼓励更多人参与锻炼，北欧国家通过建设自行车道和社区健身中心，显著提升了居民运动频率。 - 预防慢性疾病
世界卫生组织指出，缺乏运动是心血管疾病和糖尿病的主要诱因，增加体育设施可直接减少久坐行为，从源头改善健康。 - 社会效益
公共运动场所能增强社区凝聚力，中国的“全民健身计划”通过修建广场舞场地，既提升了健康水平，又丰富了老年人社交生活。
反对仅依赖体育设施的观点
- 效果有限
单纯增加设施无法保证使用率，许多城市健身房闲置率高，而快餐文化盛行，说明健康意识比硬件更重要。 - 需多管齐下
公共卫生改善需要综合措施，如健康教育（如日本“食育”课程）、食品监管（如墨西哥对含糖饮料征税）等。 - 经济与地域差异
贫困地区可能因维护成本无法持续运营设施，反而加剧资源不平等。
高分写作结构
： paraphrase题目+明确讨论框架。
主体段1： 支持体育设施的3个理由，结合数据或案例。
主体段2： 反对观点的3个论据，强调局限性。
主体段3： 个人观点（建议折中方案）。
： 重申核心立场，避免模板化总结。
范文示例
Introduction
Public health enhancement has long been a global priority, yet opinions diverge on whether expanding sports infrastructure is the optimal solution. While some argue that facilities like gyms and parks are pivotal, others contend that holistic strategies are indispensable. This essay will examine both stances before presenting a balanced approach.
Body Paragraph 1
Proponents of sports facilities highlight their role in fostering physical activity. In Copenhagen, the construction of cycling lanes increased bicycle commuters by 68% within a decade, directly reducing obesity rates. Moreover, accessible amenities democratize fitness; a WHO report revealed that communities with public pools exhibit 30% lower hypertension incidence. Finally, shared spaces like soccer fields cultivate social bonds, as seen in Brazil’s favelas where sports programs decreased youth crime by 22%.
Body Paragraph 2
However, critics rightly point out structural flaws. In Los Angeles, 40% of municipal gyms operate below capacity due to high membership fees, proving that affordability matters more than availability. Additionally, Singapore’s “Healthier SG” initiative demonstrates that subsidizing medical check-ups achieves faster results than building stadiums. Without tackling junk food marketing or sedentary jobs, facilities alone cannot offset modern lifestyle risks.
Personal View
The most viable path integrates both approaches. Governments should allocate 60% of health budgets to facilities in underserved areas, paired with 40% for education campaigns. Germany’s “Trimmy” mascot campaign, which combined school sports upgrades with nutrition classes, reduced childhood obesity by 15% in five years—a model worth emulating.
提分技巧
- 词汇升级：避免重复使用“important”，替换为“pivotal,” “indispensable,”或“paramount”。
- 数据活用：虚构数据需合理，如“a survey by The Lancet”比“some studies show”更可信。
- 逻辑连接：用“Nevertheless,” “Conversely,”等替代“But,”提升连贯性。
公共卫生议题需要辩证思维，雅思考官青睐考生展现批判性分析能力，掌握“平衡讨论+具体案例”的公式,便能轻松驾驭此类题目。
