题目回顾
Task 2:
Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
讨论“提高法定驾驶年龄是否为提升道路安全的最佳方式”，属于典型的“观点类”题型，考生需明确立场，并通过论证支撑观点。
高分范文解析
Introduction
Road safety remains a critical global issue, with governments seeking effective measures to reduce accidents. While raising the legal driving age may seem a plausible solution, its effectiveness is debatable. This essay argues that alternative strategies, such as stricter licensing tests and public awareness campaigns, would be more impactful.
Body Paragraph 1: 提高驾驶年龄的局限性
Advocates of increasing the minimum driving age believe younger drivers lack maturity and experience, leading to reckless behavior. However, age alone does not guarantee responsibility. Many older drivers exhibit poor judgment due to distractions like mobile phones. For example, Japan’s 2015 traffic data showed that drivers aged 18–20 caused only 12% of accidents, while those aged 30–50 accounted for 34%. Thus, focusing solely on age ignores broader risk factors.
Body Paragraph 2: 更有效的替代方案
Instead of arbitrary age limits, enhancing driver training and testing would address skill gaps. Countries like Germany require rigorous driving courses, resulting in lower accident rates. Additionally, technology can play a pivotal role—installing speed cameras or mandating vehicle safety features (e.g., automatic braking) has proven effective in nations like Sweden.
Body Paragraph 3: 社会教育与政策结合
Long-term solutions should combine education and enforcement. Public campaigns highlighting the consequences of drunk driving, as seen in Australia’s “Don’t Drink and Drive” initiative, reduced fatalities by 22% within five years. Similarly, stricter penalties for traffic violations create stronger deterrents.
Conclusion
Raising the driving age is an oversimplified approach to a complex issue. Comprehensive measures targeting driver competence, technological innovation, and societal attitudes offer a more sustainable path to safer roads.
写作技巧提炼
- 立场清晰：首段直接表明态度，避免模棱两可。
- 数据支撑：引用具体研究或案例（如日本、德国数据）增强说服力。
- 批判性思维：反驳对立观点时，用逻辑而非情绪化语言（如“年龄≠责任感”）。
- 词汇多样性：避免重复使用“young drivers”，可替换为“adolescent motorists”“inexperienced individuals”。
- 句式灵活：混合简单句与复杂句（如“While…, …”引导让步从句）。
常见误区警示
- 跑题风险：题目问“是否最佳方式”，需对比其他措施，而非只讨论年龄利弊。
- 泛泛而谈：避免空洞表述如“Education is important”，应具体到“mandatory simulator training for new drivers”。
- 时态错误：讨论研究时用过去时（e.g., “A 2016 study found…”），普遍事实用现在时（e.g., “Speed cameras reduce accidents”）。
