2013年英语专业四级考试作文题目要求考生围绕"Should We Help Strangers?"展开论述,这道题目看似简单,却考验着考生的思辨能力、语言组织能力和价值观表达,本文将深入分析高分范文的写作技巧,帮助考生掌握专四作文的得分要点。
分析与审题要点
原题呈现:
"Some people think we should help strangers while others think we should not. What is your opinion? Write a composition of about 200 words on the following topic: Should We Help Strangers?"
审题关键:
- 明确要求写议论文,需要立场鲜明
- 200词左右的篇幅限制
- 必须回应两种对立观点
- 需要个人观点与论证
常见误区:
- 单纯描述现象不表明立场
- 论证缺乏逻辑层次
- 语言表达中式英语明显
- 篇幅严重不足或超限
高分范文展示
Should We Help Strangers?
In contemporary society, whether to assist strangers sparks heated debate. While some argue helping unknowns may incur risks, I firmly believe offering help reflects essential humanity.
Admittedly, caution is understandable. Media occasionally report cases where good Samaritans were deceived or injured. Such incidents understandably make people hesitate before extending help. However, these rare cases should not overshadow the fundamental value of mutual aid in civilized societies.
Helping strangers cultivates social cohesion. When a lost tourist receives directions or an elderly person gets assistance crossing the street, these micro-interactions weave the fabric of community trust. Anthropological studies confirm societies with higher helping behaviors demonstrate greater collective well-being.
Practically, we can adopt smart approaches. Instead of providing monetary aid which might be misused, offering to call emergency services or guiding someone to professional help balances compassion with prudence. Community volunteer programs also provide structured channels for assisting strangers safely.
Ultimately, the measure of a society lies in how it treats its most vulnerable members. By judiciously helping strangers, we nurture the empathy that distinguishes humanity. The minor risks pale in comparison to the profound social benefits.
(Word count: 198)
范文结构解析
引言段落技巧
- 首句直切主题,使用contemporary society提升立意
- 第二句用while对比两种观点,同时明确个人立场
- 避免模板化表达如"with the development of society"
让步段写作要点
- 以Admittedly开头,展示辩证思维
- 选用media reports作为论据来源,增强可信度
- 用However转折,自然过渡到主体论证
主体论证层次
- 社会价值层面:social cohesion, community trust
- 学术支持:anthropological studies提升权威性
- 解决方案:提出practical approaches体现深度
结尾升华策略
- 引用社会价值观衡量标准(measure of a society)
- 对比minor risks与profound benefits强化论点
- 避免简单重复前文,而是提升到人性高度
语言亮点分析
词汇升级技巧
基础表达 | 升级版本 |
---|---|
help | assist, extend help |
because | given that, considering |
good people | good Samaritans |
connection | social cohesion |
高分句式
- 让步状语从句:
"While some argue..., I firmly believe..." - 数据引用:
"Anthropological studies confirm..." - 解决方案提出:
"Instead of..., offering to... balances...with..."
衔接手段
- 逻辑连接词:Admittedly, However, Ultimately
- 代词指代:Such incidents, these micro-interactions
- 同义替换:assistance - help - aid
常见问题改进对照
问题作文片段:
"We shouldn't help strangers because many people are bad. They maybe cheat you. I have heard many stories about this."
改进版本:
"Prudence in assisting strangers is warranted, as isolated cases of exploitation do exist. Police statistics indicate approximately 3% of reported scams involve impersonators seeking help."
改进要点:
- 避免绝对化表述(many people are bad)
- 增加数据支持(police statistics)
- 使用正式语体(impersonators替代cheat you)
备考建议
- 建立论点库:收集社会热点话题的正反观点
- 背诵功能句式:如表达让步、转折、结论的30种句型
- 限时训练:严格控制在35分钟内完成审题、写作、检查
- 多样化输入:阅读The Economist的Opinion板块,学习论证方法
- 修改重于写作:完成作文后至少修改三次,关注逻辑流和语言准确性
考场实战提醒:
- 前5分钟列简要提纲
- 每段控制在40-50词
- 留3分钟检查语法错误
- 避免涂改,保持卷面整洁
从阅卷角度而言,高分作文往往具备三个特征:清晰的论证脉络、地道的语言表达、以及体现批判性思维的深度,考生应当通过系统训练,将这三点转化为稳定的写作能力。
英语写作能力的提升本质上是对思维方式的重塑,当学生能够用英语的逻辑组织观点,用精确的语言表达思想时,专四作文就不再是应试任务,而成为展示语言素养的窗口。